Security as a Partner for Growth

The C-Suite's Security Blind Spot

For many executives and boardrooms at growth-focused companies, ‘corporate security' means a night shift guard, dusty cameras, and an insurance policy they hope to never read. It's perceived as a cost, a compliance checkbox, a janitorial function for risks that have materialized. However, in our interconnected world, full of threats, this view isn't just outdated: it puts people, bottom line, and reputation at risk.

The prevailing, yet profoundly flawed, mindset relegates security to the operational basement, a tactical necessity rather than a business enabler. Most companies, particularly in their nascent states, adopt basic security measures: fences, turnstiles, cameras, guards, and insurance. These create a false sense of safety

The problem stems from a fragmented view of security: physical in one corner, cyber in another, personnel somewhere else. Often, this leads to working with several security vendors, each delivering a specific service or product. As a result, the business leadership team sees separate costs, not a cohesive strategy. This gap leads to reactive spending on the latest scare rather than smart investment tied to business goals.

But it doesn’t need to be this way. Security can become a competitive advantage by enabling business resilience while executives focus on growth and performance.

Security can become a competitive advantage by enabling business resilience while executives focus on growth and performance.

The Early-Stage Illusion: Why 'Basic Security' Isn't Enough

The "good enough" security of a startup usually focuses on door locks, alarms, lobby guards and basic firewalls. In some cases, that may be enough. Much will depend on the sector, the company’s risk profile and leadership’s growth aspirations.

However, in many instances, “basic” security offers false comfort. As a company grows in size, value, and visibility, these basic measures become insufficient against real-world threats, regulatory requirements and to deliver on brand trust.

1. Lack of a scalable framework: Early procedures and workflows that worked for ten employees in one site break down with thirty employees across multiple sites.
2. Limited in-house expertise: The receptionist who watched the door can't become security chief when bidding for larger enterprise or government contracts.
3. Fragmented vendor ecosystem: Multiple uncoordinated providers (guards, alarms, CCTV, access control) increase complexity and cost.
4. Technology obsolescence and inefficiency: Those old cameras, which might be placed in the wrong spots, offer, if anything, a record of what happened, not prevention.
5. Missed ROI opportunities: Security investments are reactive and rarely aligned with cost reduction, risk mitigation, business enablement, insurance incentives or tax optimization.
6. High compliance pressure: Regulatory frameworks (e.g., HIPPA, OSHA) demand verifiable security controls, policy, and documentation, burdening operations.
7. Strategic misalignment: The early security set-up falls behind the rest of the organization, setting it up for failure in the longer term.

This illusion grows when executives focus on visible measures such as guards and cameras, while ignoring process weaknesses, poor vetting of business and technology partners, weak data handling, misaligned governance, gaps in understanding the shifting geopolitical landscape, or missing crisis plans.

The costs hide in plain sight. Founders see small incidents such as lost laptops, minor thefts, or data leaks as "costs of doing business." Near misses are forgotten. Executives think they're safe because of visible but shallow defenses. Then, when a major threat such a sophisticated attack, a compliance failure, an intelligence gap or a workplace violence incident hit, the company is caught flat-footed. The costs far exceed what prevention would have cost.

The maturity journey for security teams at growth-focused companies is rarely a straight line; it’s usually a winding road. Often, inflection points drive the development of the security function, and leaders must ensure continued alignment to support a resilient enterprise.

Inflection Points: When Security Becomes a Business Issue

Corporate security must evolve with the rest of the business. Key inflection points signal when the C-suite must take control of security strategy:

1. The Need For Security Becomes Obvious: Leadership at growth-focused companies naturally prioritizes driving new business and ensuring strong performance. Security is not often front of mind. However, an incident, a news story, or a conversation with a peer can suddenly reveal a critical gap: Are we truly compliant? Is our insurance coverage adequate? Are we overspending on security—or worse, underestimating our risk exposure? We hear about scary stories of costly attacks, expensive security services, or burdensome paperwork to meet regulatory requirements. But it doesn’t have to be this way. By realizing early on the role that security plays in protecting value and sustaining growth, leaders have taken the first step towards building a resilient business.

2. Your Security Team Has a Pulse: When you hire security personnel, you cross a strategic threshold. If they just manage guards and cameras or react to minor incidents, you waste valuable resources. Security staff need more than job descriptions: they need a mission tied to business goals. They need clear targets, measurable KPIs, and a strategic plan. Are they empowered to assess risk? Do they help with business continuity? Do they report meaningful metrics to leadership? If not, security becomes a rudderless ship that adds no strategic value.
3. The Big Leagues Call: External pressure often forces security onto the C-suite agenda when pursuing large contracts. Suddenly that enterprise client or government contract comes with a 100-page security addendum or demand for ISO 27001, SOC 2, CMMC, HIPAA, or PCI-DSS certification. The sales team panics. Legal scrambles. Can you honestly claim robust incident response, data encryption, and personnel security? This affects market access, credibility and, ultimately, revenue. Failing these assessments means lost deals and damaged reputation. These standards aren't just hurdles, they're gatekeepers to growth.
4. The Wolves at the Door: The threat landscape has shifted. It's not just petty crime or basic hacking. Modern threats include organized criminals after intellectual property, angry ex-employees planning sabotage, activists disrupting operations, and state-sponsored actors targeting executives or infrastructure. These aren't "IT problems" for the tech team, or “access control challenges” for the Facilities team to address. They threaten the entire enterprise and demand top-level response across all functions. Cyber and physical threats now connect. A cyber-attack can disable physical systems; a physical breach can enable cyber intrusion. This needs integrated thinking, not siloed responses.

Warning Signs of Overexposure and Wasted Spend

Without strategic security management from the top, companies bleed money on measures of limited value, face too much risk, or both. Warning signs for growing companies include:

• The "Whack-a-Mole" Approach: Security stays reactive, chasing the latest incident with no proactive strategy. The team looks like strained emergency room staff, not strategic planners proactively supporting the company’s growth.
  
• The "Accidental CSO": Critical security tasks fall to an IT manager, HR director, or Facilities head with other duties. They lack the training, resources, expertise, authority, and time to manage complex security needs.
  
• The "Shiny Object" Graveyard: The budget goes to disconnected technologies and vendor services bought on hype or fear, with no thought for integration or ROI. You have more security dashboards than a 747 cockpit, but no one knows if you're safer.
  
• The "Black Hole" Budget: Security costs rise annually, but organizational confidence in the security posture does not improve. Incidents may continue to occur, compounding risk and cost.

Growth-focused companies often normalize these problems. The "Whack-a-Mole" approach becomes "how we do things." The "Accidental CSO" gets praised for "wearing multiple hats." Without the C-suite involvement in security, these critical issues might become entrenched.

Make Corporate Security a Partner Throughout the Organization’s Journey

A robust, strategically managed corporate security function is a required companion for leadership at growth-focused organizations. The review of the common pitfalls and necessary evolutions of corporate security underscores several critical truths:

• "Basic" security measures are inadequate when scaling a business in an ever-evolving threat environment.
• Security does not have to be an expensive, complex undertaking: leaders who realize this early on will be well placed to design a security function that is genuinely aligned with their business priorities.
• Specific inflection points are signals that leadership attention and strategic direction are required. 
• Persisting with a purely tactical, reactive approach to security leads to overexposure, wasted resources, and a dangerous false sense of preparedness.
• Conversely, embracing a strategic, proactive security posture, architected in alignment with business goals, transforms security into a powerful enabler.

The ultimate "point" at which the C-suite should think about corporate security is not some distant, future crisis. It is now. And it is not a one-time consideration but a continuous strategic dialogue, woven into the fabric of executive decision-making, much like finance, operations, or market strategy. Waiting for a major crisis to force the issue is an abdication of leadership. The alternative is to learn the hard way. And in the unforgiving market, the hard way is often fatal to careers, reputations, and entire businesses.

Back to All Holtium Insights